| |

More People, Less Water
in the Offing
Sustainability and safe-yield, two terms used in reference
to water supplies, connote a state of equilibrium, that water resources
will not be consumed in excess of renewable supplies. Recent research
suggests that meeting that water resource ideal may pose a very
vigorous challenge. Arizona population is expected to greatly increase,
and Colorado River flow will likely significantly diminish. In the
tradition of the Old West a showdown threatens.
Report: Arizona’s Population to Double
by 2036
With the U.S population reaching 300 million, population growth
is much in the national news. A recent article brings the issue
closer to home, at the state level, by projecting Arizona’s
population growth into 2036. It is a report that will greatly interest
water managers.
 |
| Phoenix the Citistate |
According to the article Arizona will more than double its population
during the next 30 years, with another 8.5 million residents added
to the 6 million-plus that presently live here. Population increase
will be especially pronounced in the major urban areas: Phoenix
is expected to increase its present population of 4 million people
to 9.7 million while Tucson, with a present population of just under
1 million, is expected to grow to 1.7 million.
An undoubtedly greatly enlarged Phoenix metropolitan area will account
for two-thirds of the total population growth; metro Tucson is expected
to account for 12 percent.
Checking Census Bureau population estimates the article notes that
Arizona was the 17th-largest state in 2005. It progressed to 16th
place by mid-2006 surpassing Tennessee. The coming year will likely
see Arizona become the 13th largest state by outpacing Indiana,
Washington and Massachusetts. Come 2036, Arizona will achieve top-10
status, in competition for the number 5 ranking.
The report breaks its forecasts into five-year increments, with
Arizona’s population topping 7 million in 2010 and 8 million
five years later. Another 2 million or more people will be added
each subsequent decade.
The article also notes research done by the Maricopa Association
of Governments that reports population densities will not be confined
to the two major urban cores but will stretch from Sierra Vista
to Kingman.
According to the article one result of this dramatic population
increase is an expansion of current metro boundaries, with population
spilling into surrounding counties. Land along I-10 will likely
become prime real estate as the two urban centers literally grow
closer together. The report refers to a study done by Robert E.
Lang at Virginia Tech’s Metropolitan Institute stating that
Pima, Pinal and Maricopa counties will make up one of the country’s
ten “megapolitan areas.”
The increased population expanded over a greater area of the state
means a greater need for regional planning. Taking center stage
as the central city in a state that is part of a single global economic
system, Phoenix will become “the Phoenix Citistate.”
In a statement water planners would appreciate the article says,
“The challenge to plan for and accommodate the tremendous
growth yet to come has never been greater.”
The article appeared in the October edition of Arizona’s Economy,
a publication of the Economic and Business Research Center of the
University of Arizona’s Eller College of Management. Marshall
J. Vest is the author of the report and director of the center.
Drought May be Way of the Future
Analyses presented at a recent conference does not bode well for
future Colorado River basin states’ water supplies. Marty
Hoerling of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s
Climate Diagnostics Center presented the most dire scenario. He
examined 18 different global circulation model outputs and noted
that the Colorado River basin and other areas of the interior West
will likely be greatly affected by increased temperatures due to
global warming.
He calculated that flows at Lee Ferry could be reduced by 40 percent
by 2060. In a shorter 25-year period, he suggested that Lees Ferry
flows could decline below 12 million acre feet on average. This
would be a serious situation considering that Colorado River water
allocations among upper and lower basin states was figured in 1922
on an annual river flow at Lees Ferry of 16.4; each basin is to
receive 7.5 maf each year. It is has been long realized that the
16.4 maf figure was flawed but Hoerling’s is a particularly
low and unsettling revised calculation.
Almost all the models show a steady increase in temperatures; the
models are less in agreement about the effect climate change will
have on precipitation.
Other research presented at the conference concluded the expected
increased temperatures will result in higher evapotranspiration
and less snowpack; less runoff will then occur. Richard Palmer of
the University of Washington reported that natural snow pack reservoirs
are now diminishing and that the smallest snowpack on record occurred
in winter of 2005
An Australian scientist offered what might be viewed as cold comfort
to her U.S. colleagues; she said they should treat drought not as
an anomaly but as the norm. She offered her country as an example
where drought is not considered a disaster but a condition that
might be expected as an aspect or characteristic of a very variable
climate
Sponsored by the Geological Society of America, the Sept. 18 - 20
conference was titled “Managing Drought and Water Scarcity
in Vulnerable Environments: Implementing a Roadmap for Change in
the United States;” its intent was to develop a national drought
strategy. |
Plan Notes Ways to Increase Colorado River Supplies
The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation’s recently released 2007 Annual Operating
Plan for Colorado River Reservoirs includes strategies intending to increase
available water supplies. With increased river flows unlikely, the plan
relies on better management of the river between Lake Mead and the Mexican
border. A study once reported that the United States loses about 500,000
acre feet of river water each year to Mexico due to mismanagement.
One of the strategies is to build a small reservoir to ensure a more a
more efficient delivery of water from Lake Mead to downriver farmers or
irrigation districts. The way it now works is water released from Lake
Mead for downriver agricultural use may take several days to reach its
destination. Meanwhile changing conditions such as rain may result in
the water not needed. Unclaimed by U.S. agricultural interests, the released
water then flows to Mexico.
The 8,000 acre-foot reservoir, which would be located in California about
25 miles outside Yuma, along the All American Canal, would provide temporary
storage until the water is returned to the system. Nevada will pay to
construct the reservoir, which is scheduled for completion by 2009, to
earn shares of the saved water.
The plan also calls for farm-farrowing, with farmers paid not to plant
fields. The water not used would remain in Lake Mead and be available
for other uses. Reclamation will contribute funds to farm-farrowing efforts.
California has thus far made more use of this strategy than Arizona.
The plan’s most noteworthy strategy is to restart the Yuma desalter.
Once viewed as a white elephant, a relic of a bygone era, the desalter
now is viewed as a project worth revisiting during drought-struck times.
The plan calls for restarting the plant for a 90-day test to determine
feasibility of operation and costs. Scheduled to restart in March, the
plant would operate at 10 percent capacity.
Operation of the plant was a very controversial issue at one time due
to concern its operation would environmentally damage the Cienega de Santa
Clara, a Mexican wetland, by cutting off agricultural runoff. In what
is considered an extraordinary breakthrough various groups involved in
the controversy were able to work out their differences to identify a
set of management alternatives agreeable to all.
During the plant’s test run the water quality of the wetland will
be monitored, with the Central Arizona Project funding the $80,000 water
monitoring effort.
Robert Johnson, New Reclamation Chief
The U.S. Senate has confirmed Robert Johnson as the 20th person to lead
the Bureau of Reclamation. He is well known by water officials in Arizona
and throughout the West as Reclamation’s Lower Colorado Regional
Director, the position he held before becoming Bureau head.
As regional director, Johnson oversaw the last 700 miles of the Colorado
River, Hoover Dam, and numerous other Reclamation activities in southern
Nevada, southern California and Arizona. In that capacity he initiated
and directed significant changes in the management of the Colorado River.
Johnson joined Reclamation in 1975 in the Mid-Pacific Region in Sacramento.
Since then he has held several other leadership positions, including Deputy
Regional Director, Chief of Water, Land, and Power Operations Division
in the Lower Colorado Region, and a management position in the Commissioner’s
Office in Washington, D.C.
See Guest View, page 6, for statement from Commissioner Johnson.
New Law Joins Fight Against Exotic Plants
Congress recently passed a bill to strengthen the ongoing battle against
nonnative plant species that have damaged river systems throughout the
West. The Salt Cedar and Russian Olive Control Demonstration Act will
support activities to control these nuisance plants that have challenged
all efforts to eradicate them.
The new law directs the Bureau of Reclamation to work with the U.S. Department
of Agriculture to conduct at least five salt cedar and Russian olive assessment
and demonstration programs. The bill authorizes $20 million for FY2006
and $15 million annually from 2007-10 to provide grants to states and
public/private partnerships to identify the best ways to eradicate these
nonnative species.
The effort to eradicate thirsty nonnative species has gained momentum
due to the ongoing drought; a mature salt cedar or Russian olive plant
can consume up to 100 - 200 gallons of water a day.
Water supplies may have been the immediate concern but broader environmental
purposes also are served. The exotic plants crowd out native trees like
willows and cottonwoods, add salinity to the soil, and lower the water
table. A dense growth of salt cedar can reroute a river’s flow,
thus interfering with its ability to control floods and move sediment.
Wildlife species are left without the natural backwaters they need.
Removing the plants without causing river bank erosion can improve stream
flows and help restore native vegetation. Strategies to eradicate the
salt cedar have included bulldozing, chemically treating salt-cedar infested
land and releasing beetles that feed on the plant

|
|